Whenever the issue of minimum wage or overtime pay comes up,
right-wing think tanks such as the Cato Institute and the American Enterprise
Institute, plus the Chamber of Commerce, join forces with impressive sounding
articles—all of which rail against raising wages for the lowest earners among
us. We are then treated to a sad collection of businessmen claiming that any such
raises will put them out of business. "Can't afford it," they say,
"It'll make us uncompetitive!"
Really? Just which competitors will you be uncompetitive
with? It can't be foreign companies, because you've already shipped those jobs
overseas--to take advantage of third-world slave wages. It can't be domestic
companies, because the wage laws will be the same for them. So, who is it that
will now offer lower prices and make you uncompetitive?
Another argument is that higher wages will cause reduced
employment because the companies, in protest against increased labor costs,
will lay off workers. So, why do they have these employees if they can now
dispense with them? It's hard to imagine that businesses are so generous as to
give employment to people they don't need. In addition there are at least 64 reputable
studies* that show this claim to be false.
"It could result in higher prices to the consumer,"
is another complaint. Isn't it strange that prices keep going up even as wages
are kept low? Trips to the supermarket verify this all too well. In fact
businesses spend little time worrying about the cost to the consumer, unless
it's to see how they can be raised. They are, however, very concerned about the
prices charged by their competitors. If all producers have to use the same wage
scale, simple logic dictates that no producer will have the advantage in labor cost
structures.
The irony in all this is that Congressional opposition to a minimum
wage increase (heeding the call of their corporate masters) causes the neediest
in our society to seek public assistance in order to survive. This in turn
causes the additional expenditure of billions in taxpayer money to fund these
programs. The Republican answer is to cut these programs while they unabashedly
beat the drum for yet another pay raise. Since 1988 Congress has raised its own
pay (currently $174K/year vs. $14.5K/year for a minimum wage earner) fifteen
times while raising the minimum wage just three times.
The time has come to call the bluff of these companies and
their political lackeys. Any business plan whose success is predicated on keeping
wages below the poverty line, or free overtime, does not deserve to survive. In
reality, they are only one step above the southern plantation model—the owners
of which were willing to go to war to preserve their labor cost structure. How
far are these current profiteers willing to go to preserve theirs?
Raff Ellis, an MBA degree holder, is a retired CEO of a hi-tech company
No comments:
Post a Comment