Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Scammers Are Everywhere

Many years ago, when I went to college, teaching was considered to be an occupation of last resort for most men because it was predominately populated by women—and had low pay scales to boot. A student who wasn't succeeding at his studies in the "more highly regarded" disciplines such as science, engineering, or mathematics was told, "You could always teach." They were in essence advised, "If you can't do, then teach." Later, as our educational system expanded and began specializing in preparing teachers, this simple maxim was modified even further—"If you can't do, teach, and if you can't teach then teach others to teach."

The reason I bring this up is that it reminds me of what I see happening in writing today. Along with many other authors, I have been dismayed and frustrated about the state of publishing today. I've mentioned in previous posts how difficult it is for authors to get into print, and it's not because good books aren't being written. Quite the contrary, many really good first-time authors never get a chance to be published because of industry problems and their resultant standards and practices. And, if and when they do get published, no matter how famous the authors, they have to do virtually all of the promotion for their work. Perhaps it's just me, but don't you think it's a bit demeaning to watch our former president make the rounds of the talk shows, just to hawk his memoir? In eight years in office he had fewer press conferences than the number of book promotion appearances. (For another take on this, see the NYT column Cavett's Lament.)

This development has caused me to paraphrase the above teaching maxim, adapting it to the writing profession as it has devolved today. "If you can't write (or get published), then teach others to write (so they can't get published either), and if you can't teach others how to write, offer publishing services, editing and promotional help (all for a price, of course)."

Bear in mind that not all people who offer services are charlatans and many offer writers valuable help. But, it is mind boggling just looking at how many self-publishing companies have sprung up in the past ten years. And if you put yourself in a struggling writer's shoes, one who has spent countless hours, if not months or years, researching and writing a manuscript, only to be told "no-thanks" or worse by the mainstream publishing industry, you can understand why this branch of the business is thriving. Frustration abounds, and authors are driven to the point of wanting to get their name on a published book no matter the cost.

In order to pay the bills, many writers have been forced to branch out into the writing support business—providing editing and consulting services. Some even give classes or courses on how to get published—"teaching others how 'write for fun and profit.'" And there's no shortage of aspiring authors to attend these sessions.

A disturbing trend, however, is the promotion of the self-publishing option by people who make money from "teaching others how to write or get published." This has caused me to wonder how they divorce their self-interest from the those of the author? Think about it—if you're teaching writers how to get into print, and you point them to self-publishing—what have you taught them? Without some of these aspiring authors actually getting into print, the pool of students would dry up and these "teachers" would lose a significant portion of their fee-paying audience. Lately I've noticed courses being promoted such as, "Is self-publishing right for you?" This trend takes counseling others to "do what you can't" to new heights. There is no end to the potential division of the writing profession into fragments that someone can utilize to make money, from an unlimited pool of aspirants.

Writer's conferences are another disturbing market faction that seeks to cash in on the aspirations of fledgling authors. Come to the conference (for a not insignificant fee) and learn how to make a "dynamite proposal to publishers," and get to present your book idea (for an additional fee) to publishing agents. Wow, what hopeful writer could turn that down? I once wrote letters, in advance, to all the agents listed to appear at a certain conference to ask if they were accepting new clients. The answer was a resounding "NO!" They either weren't accepting any new clients, or were only interested in authors who had known track records. So, I wanted to ask, why are you appearing at a conference, and accepting fees from aspiring writers, only to tell them you aren't taking on new clients? The answer is as sad as it is obvious—there are a number of people making a living off the dreams of others.

It turns out that this isn't anything new, just a new wrinkle to a very old game.

2 comments:

CW3 said...

30 years ago when I thought about having a novel published there was still a remote possibility that a manuscript that came in "over the transom" might get a reading. But even back then the "Writers Marketplave" was full of ads for "Vanity Press" publishers. Today, in my interest areas, most books are self published:
http://www.airbasebooks.com/
or published by university presses or specialty publishers such as MBI or Schiffer.

Anonymous said...

It's wonderful that you patronize the self-published author but looking at it from the writer's perspective, it's a losing proposition. The self-published author gets short shrift in the marketplace--newspapers won't review them, libraries won't shelve them, and bookstores won't stock them. Other than that, it's a great life--if you don't weaken.

Raff