Monday, August 17, 2015

Why Do People "Believe?"

Recent surveys show that some 47% of Americans believe the biblical six-day account of creation. Additionally, some 70% believe in the existence of a "higher power" (God).

Interestingly, the latest data also show that more than 20% of the population is composed of atheists and agnostics. Many of these non-believers, in defense of their science-based position, contend that "believers" are either undereducated or incapable of critical thinking. Of course, this explanation is woefully simplistic because there are many intelligent, well-educated people who have a proud commitment to their "faith." This apparent divergence leads one to wonder if there might be a scientifically plausible basis for this condition.

Many of our implanted genetic inclinations have histories that reach back to the earliest days of humanoid evolution. And some are quite irrational. Primitive man's primary directive for survival led him to create supporting corollaries that also appear in our DNA. Bad experiences, such as being attacked at night by unseen predators, led to an inbred fear of darkness. Lack of understanding of the laws governing our environment, especially weather phenomena, led man to create deities for the sun, wind, rain, lightning, and other awesome events. Over time, belief in these extra-terrestrials became imperatives that were firmly impressed in our DNA.

The deities were sometimes benevolent (providing him a bountiful catch), and at other times worked against him (leaving him hungry). All too often the lords of his universe were angry and ways were sought to appease them. He made offerings, gave a share of his bounty or items that were valuable to him. In extreme circumstances he would even sacrifice his children. These supplications were thought to sometimes work (although in a highly random fashion). Regular rituals evolved with the erection of temples dedicated to the more powerful deities. And over the span of two million years of existence, our DNA has continued to be replenished and reinforced with the need to appease these gods. The "faith" imperative of unseen gods has obviously followed man wherever he went, as evidenced by its prominence in our contemporary genetic makeup.

Since the Age of Reason descended upon humanity some 500 years ago, many previously unexplained phenomena have been shown to obey newly revealed laws of science—be it physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, anthropology or mathematics. These advances have come into direct conflict with literally held biblical beliefs—especially in the account of creation. Charles Darwin's theory of evolution crashed headlong into the beliefs of biblical fundamentalists and many of them see him as their "anti-Christ."

Ironically, those who have inherited the strongest strain of the "supreme being" DNA strand are those most dedicated to opposing Darwin's theory. They steadfastedly reject the very explanation that could rationally explain the illogic of their rigid beliefs. In defense of their convictions, they attack any branch of science that might challenge their beliefs. This lack of understanding, just as in their primitive ancestors, has caused them to create a new "god," one of anti-science.


Evolutionary biologists have observed that even relatively recent ancestral experience can influence our hereditary imperatives. With the continued reinforcement of the "God" belief in a majority of the population, it doesn't appear that the need to have at least one deity will disappear any time soon.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

You don't seem to have a problem with religious people when you haul your self-published but otherwise unread books to St. James Church in order to sell them. As for the science you cut and paste, you know about as much about science as Muslims know about being non-violent.

Raff Ellis said...

I love it when brave people insult you anonymously. BTW, my books are historical in nature and don't promote any religious point of view. If Annon had read one, he/she would know that and would be able to comment more intelligently. And, the books have done very well, thank you.

Anonymous said...

Well actually I'm a lot braver than the Muslim jihadists who are continually attacking, terrorizing, and killing innocent people from the Philippines to Nigeria...actually all over the globe and have been doing so for the past 1,400 years.

Since you you're not bright a simpleton really I'll break down what I wrote and make it easier for you to understand:

You denigrate religion and sincerely religious people. (Your right.) Yet, when you want to shill your self-published books you have no trouble going into churches in order to promote them. This makes you an opportunistic hypocrite as well as being a pompous ass. I did not say that your works were religious. Perhaps if your reading comprehension level were higher you would have understood this from the beginning. As far as being "historical" that's laughable coming from a buffoon who claims the Jewish people have no "culture". In the Middle Ages the greatest writer in Arabic was considered to be the physician and sage Maimonides. Jews were the founders of Arabic cinema in Egypt in the first half of the 20th century. A Jew wrote the Iraqi constitution when that country was founded after the fall of the Ottoman Empire. The only opera ever written in Arabic was written by the Jewish musician Dawood Hosni. The Lebanese born banker and philanthropist Edmond Safra donated extensively to the American University in Beirut. Even today under the Ayatollahs the Jewish Hospital of Tehran is considered the best in Iran. I could go on but I'm sure even someone as dim(dhimmi) as you gets the point. Here's a great fact for you from www.thereligionofpeace.com : In 2007 Islam and Judaism's holiest days overlapped by 10 days. Muslims racked up 397 dead bodies in 94 terror attacks in 10 countries while Jews worked on their 159th Nobel Prize. Yeah, Jews have no "culture". Maybe you should read the work of a real scholar Raymond Ibrahim and stop projecting the worst traits of Muslims on to Christians and Jews.

Kilroy said...

Good job, Raff. Albeit vicious the ad hominem attacker's response is chock full of interesting data points from which one can draw only one conclusion. The only acceptable mode of thought is either or neither nor. The signature of the binary thinker. The only questions which may be asked are those for which we already know the answer. All others are summarily rejected—with obligatory epithets.

Language is the medium of thought.

Anonymous said...

Kilroy=Raff Ellis

My comments were not ad hominem; they were ad stercus because that's what you're a big piece of.

Raff Ellis said...

Dear Anonymous Jackass,

If you had done any research you'd have seen that the book in question was about St. James Parish. As to my rushing to the parish to hawk books, I was invited by the pastor--who actually read it, and said he loved the book. He also exhorted his parishioners to buy it. So, your remarks are pure vitriol snatched from your ass.

Also you've conflated so many issues--Muslims & Jews, which have nothing to do with the subject at hand. I have no idea where you got all that from but guess it's all from a bigoted and under-educated mind, badly in need of a course in logic. Beware pissing in the wind--you got it all over yourself.

Anonymous said...

So anyone disagrees with you and calls you out on your hypocrisy is a bigot and uneducated? Only a stupid, pompous, arrogant blowhard and jackass would claim that. If you were so secure in your intellect you wouldn't have to remind people of it with every other breath, simpleton. Like I said above, you were born anally and not vaginally.

Raff Ellis said...

Dear Anonymous Asshole,

Reread your asinine posts and then take off your mask and look in the mirror. You might recognize yourself. Also ask yourself about your need to hide behind anonymity to hurl your inane invectives.

Failed to see any hypocrisy but then I'm not reading or writing anonymously. I could trade insults all day and they would be much more literate. Your command of the language of rancor is at a very low level. Hardly worth my time.